I do think generally there should be consent and knowledge of being recorded but I think there should be exceptions for investigative journalism style of content (Creators like Reckless Ben relied on using meta glasses)
There's been a rise of those public nonsense creators who just bully and harass people in which I think governments are way to loose at enforcing and preventing it happens way to often now a days.
Most rewarding part is creating a community of like minded people and being able to show off at scale.
While I don't think it's ethical as human interaction and connection goes a lot further imo.
I don't personally have an issue with it but it should be required to label what's been AI modified as sometimes it's hard to tell. Something that comes to mind is NeuroSama (An AI livestream / VTuber) but the content is not entirely AI as the developer Vedal is a very prominent figure of the content.
The fireworks appears on good performing videos the 1 of # (in this case 4) it was the best performing video of the 4 that's been uploaded. (Or so I remember from when I posted videos / livestreams)
I'm still in favor for having a dislike counter as it helped identify good videos / tutorials especially 😅
Wasn't fully a quiet removal there was massive backlash from creators and viewers when the first hid the counter, their reasoning was "harassment". Despite everything they refuse to give it back.
It was done in two stages : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_m…r%2010,%5B24%5D
I haven't heard of the term being used to reflect adult oriented content before. I think terms like YouTuber and Tiktoker or is more widely used tho (then twitch and any live content has general term of Streamer).
AI currently as is I still feels lacks the emotion / tone to replicate the human aspect in which the viewers would for sure notice, so I personally wouldn't use it.
AI is a tool not a creative replacement imo.
I think a lot of the 24/7 livestreams are done using the livestream cloud services now, typically $30 / month or so and it just continuously runs the livestream.
There's been a few instances where changing the thumbnail and or title of older videos worked to re push it out to people. I'd assume it's still the case. 😅
For something as small as a typo I wouldn't worry about it affecting, unless as Michael said it was already performing well..
I would likely opt to rebrand the tiktok as well.
YouTube has a habit sort of locking channels from growing even more (same reason why massive Creator Jacksepticeye started posting more on his fresh second channel Spedicey)
Most of the time I just like having notes / talking points but if it's a more serious or lengthy video topic then I could foresee a full script being better.
Is there a watermark with the free version or something? I heard that colour grading in its meant to be great.
No watermark with the free version, the paid version just gives extra tools and seems to be leaning into the AI side of editing.
While I don't have first hand experience I do know a case study regarding this topic 😅
One of the largest creators and streamers now a days, CaseOh posted 22 tiktok videos pretending to be live and reportedly got 10k tiktok followers overnight (60k+ in March of 2023 he started posting in Feb 2023) and now posts 3 clips a day I believe so anyway.
He was then able to use the traction from and on his first twitch livestream had 70 - 105 viewers
I use the free version of Davinci Resolve. It does everything I need it to 😅
